Legal Opinion

Keller v. Richbart

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1933No. Docket No. 7519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The following opinion, which was prepared by the late Judge Clair Sprague Tappaan while acting as a justice pro tempore of this court, is hereby approved and adopted as the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant, the jury assessing his damages at $2,471.44. From the judg ment entered upon the jury’s verdict defendant appeals. Plaintiff’s complaint states a cause of action arising from certain alleged violations of the terms of a lease by defendant, the lessor herein named. Defendant made a general denial of the allegations of the complaint and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Schubert v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Anderson v. AdlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Heffernan v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kaye v. MelzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Kelley v. R. F. Jones Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API