Legal Opinion

Rutt v. Roche

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 25, 1952PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This is an action upon a contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to sell and the defendant to buy certain real estate in Hartford. The complaint sets forth an agreement partly written and partly oral and alleges part performance by the plaintiff. The defendant demurred on the ground that the agreement was within the Statute of Frauds and that the acts of part performance were not such as would take the contract out of the statute. The trial court sustained the demurrer on both grounds and the plaintiff has appealed.

The plaintiff concedes that the memorandum of the agreement does not satisfy the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Middletown Trust Co. v. Middletown National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Andrew v. BabcockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. Dicken v. McKinleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Harmonie Club, Inc. v. SmirnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API