Legal Opinion
Teich v. San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 1908No. Civ. No. 450PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. N. C. Coldwell, M. K. Harris, and S. L. Strother, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The main contention in this cause hinges upon the following stipulation:
“In the Supreme Court of the State of California.
“San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings (a corporation), plaintiff and respondent, v. Bank of Madera (a corporation), ■et al., defendants and appellants.
“Whereas, there is now pending in the Supreme Court of the State of California an action entitled San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings, plaintiff and respondent, v. Bank of Madera, et al., defendants and appellants . . . said action being prosecuted by the plaintiff for the purpose of foreclosing what is claimed by…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Rankin v. SatirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Ampuero v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Marjer v. LayfmenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1947
- Holstrom v. MullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927