Legal Opinion

Pickering v. Havens

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1924No. Docket No. 4121PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action to recover damages for malicious prosecution. Judgment rendered in favor of defendant and plaintiff appeals. Appellant and her husband, John W. Pickering, were the owners of the Raymond Villa, a rooming-house in the city of Pasadena, together with the furniture therein. On February 16, 1920, they leased these premises to the respondent, and at the same time they sold to respondent all the furniture in said rooming-house, excepting certain specific articles. A written lease to the premises was executed by the parties and appellant and her husband also gave to respondent a bill of sale…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Sandell v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Redgate v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. Cochran v. BonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Centers v. Dollar MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Gordon v. MountCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API