Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Boiven

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1967No. Civ. No. 8053PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

249 Cal.App.2d 207 (1967)

RUBY PITTMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

LAWRENCE BOIVEN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Civ. No. 8053.

California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist., Div. Two.

Mar. 6, 1967.

Dexter D. Penman and Edward L. Lascher for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Parker, Stanbury, McGee, Peckham & Garrett and Kenneth R. Garrett for Defendants and Respondents.

KERRIGAN, J.

While there are two codefendants, Lawrence Boiven and W. J. Boiven, the latter's liability is derivative only and by reason thereof reference will be made only to the primary defendant in considering the appeal.

Shortly before…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Green v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Harris v. OAKS SHOPPING CENTERCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Casey v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Damele v. MacK Trucks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Shiver v. Laramee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API