Legal Opinion

Burke v. Watts

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1922No. L. A. No. 6552PublishedCited by 51 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action for damages for malicious prosecution.

Appellant, W. A. Watts, owned the Virginia Apartments, in the city of San Diego, which he leased to one Mrs. Hannah F. Johnstone, who, on December 28, 1917, purchased the furnishings from the former lessees of the premises, Augusta Svedin and Olaf Svedin, her husband. On March 14", 1919, respondent, Peter Burke, an auctioneer, purchased the furnishings from Mrs. Johnstone, the consideration being certain lands in Canada which he owned, and the sum of five hundred…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Filer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Runo v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Harkrader v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Richter v. NeilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Singleton v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API