Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Bones

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1905No. 60PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff had judgment. Defendant moved for a new trial which was denied, and this appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying the motion for a new trial.

Defendant went before the justice of the peace of Analy Township in Sonoma County and swore to a complaint charging the plaintiff with petit larceny in stealing a hog, upon which the justice issued his warrant and placed the same in defendant’s hands. Defendant Bones and plaintiff Cochran lived about a mile and a half from each other, and had so lived for several years, but had only a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrington v. TibbetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ray Wong v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Gogue v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Pickering v. HavensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Howe v. OwsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API