Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Mount
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 8, 1932No. Docket No. 4518PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
In this action the plaintiff sought judgment against the defendant for and on account of a certain alleged malicious prosecution. Judgment went for the defendant. The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury. Findings were waived. From the judgment of the court the plaintiff appeals.
The alleged malicious prosecution consisted of .the filing of a complaint by the defendant, charging the plaintiff with the theft of a number of cattle. Complaint dismissed upon motion of district attorney.
The record shows that litigation has been pending between the defendant and the James J.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Runo v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Gray v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Lee v. LevisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Murphy v. DavidsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Singleton v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Credit Bureau of San Diego, Inc. v. HorethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.