Legal Opinion
Albertson v. Raboff
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1960No. Civ. 24255PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for damages in an action for malicious prosecution of a civil action. The background of this matter is stated in Albertson v. Raboff, 46 Cal.2d 375 [295 P.2d 405].
After the Supreme Court had determined that the amended complaint was sufficient to state a cause of action and had remanded the case to the trial court, a second amended complaint was filed. In that complaint, allegations were set forth in harmony with the following statement on page 383 of the opinion of the Supreme Court: ‘ ‘ Since the judgment must be reversed, plaintiff will…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Sheard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pond v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Atkins, Kroll & Co. v. Broadway Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.