Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1953No. 32578PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

This appeal by defendants from a judgment against them for the balance due on a real-estate broker’s commission, requires us to construe the contract upon which plaintiff recovered.

Prior to July 3, 1952, defendants orally employed plaintiff to sell certain real estate in Klickitat county, Washington. They agreed to pay him a commission of five per cent of the sale price. He procured Ross E. Crow and wife as purchasers, and, on July 3, 1952, an exchánge agreement, was entered into by plaintiff, defendants, and Crows.

This document expressed Crows’ agreement to purchase defendants’ property for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sams v. Olympia Holding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bloom v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Largent v. RitcheyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Richey v. BoltonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Fitzpatrick v. BradshawWashington Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dryden v. Vincent D. Miller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Burt v. HeikkalaWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Blanken v. Bechtel Properties, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1961
  4. Center Investments, Inc. v. PenhallurickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Record Realty, Inc. v. HullCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API