Richey v. Bolton
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The trial court sustained the defendants’ demurrer to the amended complaint. Plaintiffs declined to plead further, and the court thereupon entered an order dismissing the action. Plaintiffs appealed.
The question before us is whether the amended complaint states a cause of action. The allegations of the pleading may be summarized as follows: Appellants, A. W. Richey and William Heian, are duly licensed real estate brokers in the state of Washington. Respondents, J. A. Bolton and his wife, Ethel Bolton, are the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Muir v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Grammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Rogers v. LippyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Sams v. Olympia Holding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
- White v. Panama Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Dryden v. Vincent D. Miller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Largent v. RitcheyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Homefinders v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Langston v. HuffackerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.