Record Realty, Inc. v. Hull
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover a real estate broker’s commission claimed due on an exclusive multiple listing contract which stated that the plaintiffs were to receive a commission if they provided the defendants with a “ready, able and willing” buyer. The trial court entered judgment for the plaintiffs and the defendants appeal.
Findings of fact as entered by the trial court stated in pertinent part:
3. On the 5th day of October, 1971 defendants, husband and wife, executed an exclusive multiple listing contract with Genesee, Inc. for the sale of real property in the sum of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Winkelman v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- White & Bollard, Inc. v. GoodenowWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Best v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Peter M. Chalik & Associates v. HermesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Champion v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Property Brokers, Inc. v. LoyningMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Ching-Ming Chen v. Advantage Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Hilgendorf v. HagueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Peter L. Redburn, Inc. v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978