Bloom v. Christensen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, C. J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover an amount which he claimed was earned as a commission for the sale of real property belonging to the defendants. The case, tried to the court, resulted in a judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed. The assignments of error challenge the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the judgment of the trial court.
A statement of facts was not brought to this court. It is therefore necessary to ascertain whether the findings of fact sustain the judgment of dismissal.
The court’s findings disclose the following fact?: July 25, .1941,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carstens v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Godefroy v. HuppWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Goss v. BroomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Sams v. Olympia Holding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Best v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Dryden v. Vincent D. Miller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- James S. Black & Co. v. P & R Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Largent v. RitcheyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.