Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Bradshaw

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1933No. 24105. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission alleged to have been earned, and to be dne, under a written agreement involving the exchange of certain real estate. Trial was had before the court without a jury. The court made its findings of fact and conclusions of law, based upon which it subsequently entered its judgment dismissing the action. The plaintiffs have appealed.

On July 19, 1929, the written agreement on which this action is founded was executed. The agreement, in so far as it is material, reads as follows:

“This Agreement in Triplicate made and entered into this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clise Investment Co. v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. National Grocery Co. v. Pratt-Low Preserving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Westby v. Pacific Silicate Co., Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fischler v. NicklinWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Underwood v. SternerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Johnston v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Galyen v. Voyager Inn, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API