Largent v. Ritchey
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Ross Largent, a real-estate broker doing business as Largent Realty Company, sues for a commission. The defense is that the agreement for a commission was not sufficiently definite as to the amount thereof to support a judgment, and that, in any event, the agreement was rescinded by mutual consent. The principal question involved, aside from the asserted ambiguity with reference to the amount of the commission, is whether a salesman for the real-estate broker had apparent authority to rescind an agreement for a commission that had been earned.
The defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Rex H. Ritchey…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Nortz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- McNamara v. SteckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Carnation Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Tolt Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- O'Malley Investment and Realty Co. v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Dryden v. Vincent D. Miller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- James S. Black & Co. v. P & R Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Olsson v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Taylor v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.