Legal Opinion
Watrous v. Sinoway
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 22, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The plaintiff is seeking damages for the contamination by free ammonia of 2200 boxes of apples he had placed in a cold storage plant operated by the defendant. The complaint is in three counts, of which the second sounds in contract and the first and third in tort. Other than an admission that the defendant is engaged in the cold storage business, the answer to each count is in the nature of a general denial. From a judgment for the defendant the plaintiff has appealed.
The court found the following facts: The defendant has operated a cold storage plant in North Haven since 1943. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Kurtz v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Hickey v. SlatterySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Murray v. Paramount Petroleum Products Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stowe v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cappiello v. HaselmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Frissell v. John W. Rogers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Gutowski v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Trunik v. TrunikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.