Legal Opinion

Trunik v. Trunik

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 27, 1979PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant mother is appealing from an order granting the plaintiff father’s motion to modify the original custody award of their two minor children to the defendant mother. In making or modifying any award of custody, the trial court, here acting through a state referee, must be guided, pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-56 (b), by the best interests of the children. See Stewart v. Stewart, 177 Conn. 401, 408, 418 A.2d 62; Simons v. Simons, 172 Conn. 341, 348-50, 374 A.2d 1040. The defendant claims that the trial court erred because the evidence was insufficient to warrant its conclusion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrill v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. Anonymous v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Kurtz v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Simons v. SimonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Yontef v. YontefSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Cookson v. CooksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Seymour v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API