Kurtz v. Farrington
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
This action was brought on two counts. While the court found the issues for the plaintiff, it is obvious that the damages were assessed on the first count only, for the proof of the allegations of the first count entitled the plaintiff to recover $2,000 damages, plus $192 of interest, which sums comprise the exact amount of the judgment. Since the judgment was rendered on the first count alone, and the defendant has not been prejudiced by the general finding of the trial court upon both counts, we shall confine our consideration of this appeal to the first count only.
That count alleges, in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Drazen v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Ex Parte MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Long v. ColburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Harkins v. Murphy & BolanzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Moriarty v. LippeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Heating Acceptance Corporation v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Cyphers v. AllynSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.