Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Slattery

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 8, 1926PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

This is an appeal from the granting of a motion to set aside a verdict recovered by the plain tiff. The motion states three grounds, that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, that it was excessive, and that the statute of limitations had run against the cause of action. The trial court granted the motion upon the third ground, and the plaintiff appealed. He has, however, failed to have the evidence made a part of the record, and therefore his appeal has no proper standing in court. McCann v. McGuire, 83 Conn. 445, 76 Atl. 1003. It is true that the substantial matter argued…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. SkiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. Sellers v. NoahSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Kuhn v. BrownfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Miner v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  5. Fitch v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Dean v. HershowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Stowe v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Giambozi v. PetersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Tuohey v. MartinjakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API