Legal Opinion
Cappiello v. Haselman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 10, 1967PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
The plaintiff, a pedestrian, recovered a judgment for damages for personal injuries which he sustained when he was struck by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The defendant claims the court erred in concluding that he was negligent and that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence.
As a preface to his attack on these conclusions, the defendant seeks to have the court’s finding corrected. He claims that the court erred both in refusing to find certain admitted or undisputed facts set forth in his draft finding and in finding certain other facts without evidence. He…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Farrell v. Waterbury Horse R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Hennessey v. HennesseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Duffee v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Michaud v. GurneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.