Legal Opinion
O'Dea v. Amodeo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 5, 1934PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff’s injuries arose out of a collision between an automobile in which he was riding and one driven by the defendant Joseph Amodeo. It was alleged in the complaint that the car was maintained by the defendant Charles Amodeo for the use and enjoyment of his family and particularly his son Joseph, who was operating it with his father’s consent and within the scope of his authority to do so. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants and the trial court set it aside as regards Charles Amodeo. The claim made by him was that there was no evidence that the automobile was a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Board of Water Commissioners v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Griffin v. Nationwide Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Low v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.