Legal Opinion
Ray v. Parker
California Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1940No. L. A. 17207PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The defendant, as Director of Agriculture of the State of California, prosecutes this appeal from a decree permanently enjoining him from enforcing and administering in Los Angeles County the Milk Stabilization Act (Chap. 10, Div. IV, Agr. Code) and the terms and provisions' of a “Stabilization and Marketing Plan” theretofore formulated thereunder and declared effective by him in said county.
The action was commenced by certain producers, distributors, and consumers of milk in the county, eighty-three in number, and was grounded upon the dual theory that the act *280and the procedure of the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Carmona v. Division of Industrial SafetyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.