Legal Opinion

Pompeo v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 29, 1954No. C. D. 1669PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

La whence, Judge:

The dutiable classification of certain imported superchargers for Ford and Austin automobile engines is contested by the plaintiff herein.

The devices were classified by the collector of customs as machines, not specially provided for, in paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 372), as amended by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802), and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem.

Three alternative specific claims are relied upon by plaintiff herein as follows:

That the merchandise should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Welte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United American Bosch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API