Legal Opinion

Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 2, 1960No. 64136; protests 59/3599, etc. (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The cases listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, are consolidated for the purpose of trial and cover a variety of spark plugs classified by the collector of customs at Los Angeles under the parts provision contained in paragraph 369(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, or the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dee. 150, T.D. 54108, and assessed with duty at the rate of 12% per centum ad valorem, 11% per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Pompeo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Harrigan Auto Parts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Warehousing Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API