Legal Opinion

Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 19, 1956No. C. D. 1775PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawbbNce, Judge:

The collector of customs classified an importation of so-called wire control and straightener units as articles in chief value of metal and assessed duty thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802.

The protest relates to two entries, each of which included enough parts to comprise 60 sets, respectively, of wire control units, each set having some 24 different parts, such as lock…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Norma Co. of America v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Pompeo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Nord Light, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Victor Machinery Exchange, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API