Legal Opinion

Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 26, 1956No. C. D. 1776PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laweence, Judge:

An importation of ammeters was classified by tbe collector of customs in paragraph 368 (a) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 368 (a)), as modified by tbe trade agreement witb Switzerland, 69 Treas. Dec. 74, T. D. 48093, as instruments or devices intended or suitable for measuring tbe flowage of electricity, valued at not over $1.10 each. Duty was imposed thereon accordingly at tbe rate of 27% cents each, plus 32% per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiffs contend that tbe merchandise should be classified as parts of automobiles in paragraph 369 (c) of said act (19 U.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Industrial Operations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Young Windows, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. Pompeo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  5. C. J. Holt & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harrigan Auto Parts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. British Auto Parts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Gamble Vargish & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. Austin Motor Co v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API