Legal Opinion

United American Bosch Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 28, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dallingee, Judge:

These are suits against the United States, arising at the port of New York, brought to recover certain customs duties alleged to have been improperly exacted on particular importations of so-called fog lamps. Duty was levied thereon at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as manufactures of metal not specially provided for, plus three-*2fourths of 1 cent per pound -under section 601 (c) (7) of the Revenue Act of 1932 as articles containing 4 per centum or more of copper by-weight.

It is claimed that said lamps are properly dutiable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Columbia Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pompeo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Warshawsky & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. British Auto Parts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Walker v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. Acrow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API