Legal Opinion

Welte v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 27, 1914No. 1273PublishedCited by 40 opinions

.Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 33565 (T. D. 33738).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Wooden rolls wound with perforated paper especially prepared and designed for the'mechanical production of music were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as parts of musical instruments and were therefore assessed for duty at 45 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 467 of the tariff act of 1909 which reads as follows:

467. Musical instruments or parts thereof, pianoforte actions and parts thereof, * * * forty-five per centum ad valorem.

The importers protested that the rolls wound with perforated paper were either music in sheets dutiable at 25 per cent ad…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Motorola, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  5. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API