Legal Opinion

Burrows v. Burrows

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1936No. Civ. No. S. C. 8PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment denying his prayer for a divorce and granting to defendant on her cross-complaint a decree of separate maintenance at the rate of $30 per month and further ordering payment by plaintiff to defendant of the sum of $150 attorney’s fees. The alleged ground of divorce was extreme cruelty of the defendant towards plaintiff, while the former in her cross-complaint urged the same ground, augmented later during the trial, through the medium of an amended cross-complaint, to include the additional grounds of desertion and failure to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Firebaugh v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Gartlan v. C. A. Hooper & Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Stohlman v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Andrus v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Graham v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Norris v. NorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API