Stohlman v. Martin
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuba County and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
HART, J
This is an action for personal injuries alleged to have been negligently inflicted upon the plaintiff by the defendant. The action was tried by the court, a trial by jury having been waived by both parties.
The court found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded her damages in the sum of one thousand dollars. A motion for a new trial was made by the defendant and denied by the court. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial.
The findings of the court are as follows: “1. That on the 28th day of September, 1913, and while plaintiff was riding in a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Scragg v. SalleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Daly v. RuddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by14 opinions
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Skaggs v. WileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Mathers v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gartlan v. C. A. Hooper & Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.