Gartlan v. C. A. Hooper & Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor in an action to quiet title to a tract of land designated in the record as tract No. 1, portion of the Moraga Rancho, in the county of Contra Costa, and also to quiet title to certain water having its source upon an adjoining portion of said rancho designated as tract No. 2, which said water is developed and collected in a tunnel on said tract No. 2, and conveyed thence through a pipe to and upon the first-mentioned tract of land. No controversy exists as to the right of the plaintiff to have his title quieted to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firebaugh v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- McArthur v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Coonradt v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Stohlman v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Andrus v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Chase v. National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Southern Casualty Co. v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Burrows v. BurrowsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hull v. LaugharnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.