Legal Opinion

Graham v. Stewart

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1886No. 9919PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcICee, J.

— The appeal taken by defendant in this case is from a decree of foreclosure and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

I. The order denying the motion was made upon a statement of the case, indorsed by the court “ allowed,” and by the clerk of the court, “engrossed statement on motion for new trial.” The document merely specifies the object of the action, the pleadings in the case, the content's of a deed which, it is claimed, was the basis of a counter-claim filed by the defendant, and errors of law occurring at the trial. It contains no statements of any evidence given at the trial,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harper v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Ferrer v. Home Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Crowther v. RowlandsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Tryon v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Whitney v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tyrrell v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Gartlan v. C. A. Hooper & Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Dickey v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Raymond v. ThextonMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Territory of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Taylor v. CaffreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API