Legal Opinion

Yelverton v. Kemp Furniture Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1981No. 808SC419PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

The Commission made the following pertinent findings of fact:

2. The claimant worked on the employer’s furniture assembly line in the print line department as a helper. The claimant worked from 4:45 p.m. until 6:15 a.m.

3. Approximately sixty feet away from the claimant’s work station at the end of the furniture assembly line, Ricky Vick worked as the last man on the end of the line taking furniture off the line and then stacking the furniture.

4. Ricky Vick had worked in the print line department, but approximately two weeks prior to the claimant’s last day of work had been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. In Re CollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Matter of CantrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. In Re ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. In Re AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Umstead v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Whicker v. High Point Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Butler v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. FaulkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Baxter v. Bowman Gray School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API