Legal Opinion

In Re Thomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1972No. 116PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Judge Hedrick’s opinion, and the partial dissents by Judge Graham and by Chief Judge Mallard, are before us. Judge Graham dissented from the Hedrick opinion “which directs the Commission to enter an order awarding benefits.” With respect to the claimant’s rights, Judge Graham concluded: “When she quit her job to retire, claimant removed herself from the labor market. Whether she thereafter re-entered the labor market and became ‘available for work’ is a question which still must be determined by the Commission.” This is apparently so because of the quantum of proof required.

Ch…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. In Re SteelmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Mohler v. Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Dwyer v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Intercraft Industries Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Dillingham v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Matter of CantrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Yelverton v. Kemp Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Adams v. Bank United of Texas, FSBCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API