Matter of Cantrell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
We agree with the court below that the ESC’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence in the record. We are therefore bound by these findings. In re Thomas, 281 N.C. 598, 189 S.E. 2d 245 (1972). The findings present an accurate and concise description of the fact situation presented in this case, and we quote them in their entirety:
1. The claim series now under consideration was begun effective September 25, 1977, and had been continued through October 22, 1977, at the time of the adjudicator’s conference.
2. The claimant last worked for Burlington Industires, Belmont,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- In Re CollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- In Re ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- In Re StuttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Smallwood v. Florida Dept. of CommerceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Millen v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Peery v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Eason v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Yelverton v. Kemp Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Endicott v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.