State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. Faulk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
By his first assignment of error, respondent argues that the Commission’s order overruling his exceptions is insufficient for its failure to state the reasons therefor. Respondent contends this case should be remanded for a more specific order. We disagree.
The procedure for determining whether unemployment insurance taxes are due is set out in G.S. 96-4. G.S. 96-4(m) provides, in part, that a party may appeal to the Commission from the initial decision by filing exceptions, stating the grounds and objections for each one. The statute does not require the Commission to *373state the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Employment Security Commission of Wyoming v. Laramie Cabs, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Yellow Cab Co. v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Read v. Warkentin, CommissionerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gress v. Rowboat Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- STATE EX REL. EMP. SEC. COM'N v. FaulkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Gilreath v. Yellow Cab of CharlotteNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002
- State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. HuckabeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995