Legal Opinion

Tillman v. Bellamy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1955No. 533PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The only errors assigned and brought forward in plaintiff’s appeal relate to the court’s charge to the jury, in that the court failed to present certain material phases of the evidence to the jury and declare and explain the law relating thereto as required by the statute, G.S. 1-180.

The plaintiff points out that the court failed to declare and explain the law as to a material phase of the law of negligence applicable to and inherent in the evidence in this case.

The court properly explained the law of negligence as it related to the defendant’s conduct under the allegations of the complaint…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State v. ArdreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Spencer v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Hall v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Crampton v. Ivie Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Riddle v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Young v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Batts v. FaggartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API