Legal Opinion

Crampton v. Ivie Bros.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1900PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Petition allowed.

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY and FURCHES, JJ., dissent from that part of the opinion in which a new trial is granted. This is a petition to rehear the case reported in124 N.C. 591. It was then decided by a bare majority of the Court, and now we find it impossible to come to a unanimous decision, and difficult to come to any decision at all, under the circumstances, and in view of the fact that there is grave doubt in our minds whether (895) the essential principle of proximate cause was properly explained to the jury, we think that substantial justice will be best subserved by granting a new trial.

We may…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hunt v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Duval v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. McMillan v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Zagier v. . ZagierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Bagwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Harper v. . Harper and Wickham v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API