Batts v. Faggart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Faggart asserts, ais his first ground of demurrer, that the 'Complaint does not 'allege a cause of action against him. If this be true, there is no misjoinder of parties and causes of action. Shaw v. Barnard, 229 N.C. 713, 51 S.E. 2d 295; Jordan v. Maynard, 231 N.C. 101, 56 S.E. 2d 26; Wetherington v. Motor Co., 240 N.C. 90, 81 S.E. 2d 267.
The complaint contains to allegation, of injury or damage proximately caused by the first collision, to wit, when plaintiff’s car was struck by .the car operated .by Faggart. Plaintiff seeks to recover for injuries caused by the second collision, to wit,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Riddle v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hall v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Nance v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Hester v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Green v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.