Legal Opinion

Spencer v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1938PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"WinboeNE, J.

Defendant’s assignment of error to the failure of the court below to “declare and explain the law arising” upon the evidence offered in support of the various allegations of contributory negligence is well taken, and entitles the defendant to a new trial.

It is the duty of the judge presiding at the trial of an action which is submitted to the jury “to state in a plain and correct manner the evidence given in the case and to declare and explain the law arising thereon.” C. S., 564. This statute “confers upon litigants a substantial legal right and calls for instructions as to the,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Eastern Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Bowen v. . SchnibbenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Commissioner of Banks v. Florence Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. State v. . FriddleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. ArdreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API