Legal Opinion

Von Saxe v. Barnett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1923No. 17786PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant, a minor, through his guardian ad litem, sued to recover damages for injuries sustained on account of being struck by an automobile driven by the respondent husband, Jacob E. Barnett. At the time of the accident, appellant was five years and four months old. He was struck by an automobile belonging to-respondents, on Boren avenue, while he was crossing in a westerly direction between Spring and Madison streets, Seattle, the respondent’s automobile approaching from the north. The negligence charged was that the automobile was operated at a high and dangerous and unlawful rate of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Chicago City Railway Co. v. WilcoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Johnson v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Roberts v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Schoonover v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Price v. Kitsap TransitWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Bush v. New Jersey & New York Transit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Chadwick v. EkWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Carraway v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API