Legal Opinion

Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1939No. 27617PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 97 P.2d 119. This action was instituted by Opal Morris, as the personal representative of the estate of Wade Morris, deceased, for the benefit of herself and three minor daughters, to recover damages against the defendants, Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation, Henry A. Scandrett, Walter Cummings, and George I. Haight, trustees in bankruptcy thereof, Frank Warren, and Charles T. Holley, for the death of Wade Morris, husband of plaintiff and father of the three minor children, which occurred at a highway grade crossing west of Ellensburg, in a…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Scott v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Traver v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hutton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Ineas v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API