Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Spokane Street Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1900No. 3352PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County — Hon. William E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Plaintiff, by his guardian ad litem, commenced an action against defendant, a street railway company of Spokane, for personal injuries sustained through negligence of the company, and alleged that Spokane was a city with a population of over 30,000; that Riverside avenue, where the injury occurred, was one of the principal thoroughfares and public streets of the city, on which a large amount of business was transacted, and across which all the people of the city were accustomed and had a right to travel; that, by reason of the public use of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. Shea v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Consolidated Traction Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  4. Redford v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Thompson v. Salt Lake Rapid Transit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Traver v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Richmond v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Beeman v. Puget Sound Traction Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API