Price v. Kitsap Transit
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Plaintiffs Carl Price and his wife brought suit against Defendant Kitsap Transit for injuries Mr. Price sustained while he was a passenger on a bus owned by Kitsap Transit. The trial court assigned fault for Mr. Price’s injuries to three parties as follows: 10 percent to Kitsap Transit; 80 percent to a 4-year-old passenger; and 10 percent to the father of the 4-year-old passenger. Holding the trial court improperly assigned fault to a 4-year-old child, the Court of *459Appeals reversed the trial court decision and remanded to the trial court for reapportionment of fault. We accepted Kitsap…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Glover v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- World Wide Video, Inc. v. City of TukwilaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Staats v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2000
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.