Legal Opinion
Taliaferro v. Industrial Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1955No. Civ. 16151PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after a demurrer to his amended, complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
In his original complaint plaintiff sought to enjoin the commencement of a threatened action at law by defendant to collect $1,225 alleged to be due under a policy of insurance covering workmen’s compensation liability. Plaintiff alleged that defendant had “illegally, unjustly, arbitrarily, unlawfully, and unreasonably fixed, determined, levyed (sic) and assessed against plaintiffs an additional premium charge allegedly due and payable” under its policy in an amount of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Cyr v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Johnson v. Sun Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Pagett v. Indemnity Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bartholomew v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Connerly v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Welden v. Davis Auto ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Hernandez v. StabachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983