Legal Opinion
Cyr v. White
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1947No. Civ. 13565PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
The right of the trial court to sustain without leave to amend the demurrer to the complaint depends primarily upon the question whether, in a sixth class city, the council is legally required to award a contract for advertising legal notices to the lowest responsible bidder, or has discretion in the matter.
So far as material here, the allegations of the complaint are that Burlingame is a city of the sixth class; that plaintiffs are copartners, publishing, in the city of Burlingame, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, established as such by court decree, called “The Editor of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Harris v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- West v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Estate of JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Times Publishing Co. v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Baker v. LittmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Andrews v. Joint Clerks Port Labor Relations CommitteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Raymond v. Fresno City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Stone v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.