Legal Opinion

Connerly v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 2014No. C073753PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUARTE, J.

INTRODUCTION

This case involves two policy issues that are often viewed as controversial: (1) racial, ethnic, and gender preferences, and (2) the decennial redistricting process. But because this appeal turns on a counterintuitive quirk of California appellate law, we need not reach the merits.

By statute, “When any court makes an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend the question as to whether or not such court abused its discretion in making such an order is open on appeal even though no request to amend such pleading was made.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 472c, subd.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Grutter v. BollingerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. King v. CompPartners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Hacker v. Homeward Residential, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Goonewardene v. ADP, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Hogue v. Hogue, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Cue v. Ansett Aircraft Spares & Services CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API