Welden v. Davis Auto Exchange
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAZIL, J. pro tem. *
The judgment, from which this appeal is taken, dismissed defendant’s cross-complaint in an action originally filed in the municipal court, later transferred to the superior court because the amount of the cross-complaint exceeded the jurisdiction of the lower court.
George Welden, doing business as Wholesalers Adjustment Bureau, assignee for collection of cross-defendant Industrial Indemnity Company, sued defendant Eugene A. Taliaferro, doing business as Davis Auto Exchange, in the municipal court of San Francisco for insurance premiums claimed due Industrial from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gray v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- First National Bank v. NasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Brown v. RouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Breckenridge v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Knight v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Cooper v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Holt v. PardueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.