Legal Opinion

Weidner v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1993No. S-4813PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

This case involves a public road built in 1952 and reconstructed in 1968. A portion of the road traverses privately-owned property. The State admittedly has a valid easement for the road as originally built. The private landowner claims, however, that in reconstructing the road in 1968 the State changed the course of the road and thereby took an additional easement over the altered path of the roadway. The State denies that the path of the road ever changed. Alternatively, the State argues that even if such a change occurred, the landowner’s suit for inverse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. FlickingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Braun v. Alaska Commercial Fishing & Agriculture BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Exxon Corp. v. BurglinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Lakeview Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLC v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2002
  5. Lane v. City of KotzebueAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API