Legal Opinion

Lane v. City of Kotzebue

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1999No. S-8357PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Wilfred Lane sued the City of Kotzebue for shutting off his water and installing water and sewer lines on his property without permission. He alleged negligence, trespass, and nuisance. The superior court granted summary judgment for the City. Lane appeals. We reverse because Lane has demonstrated both that there are genuine issues of material fact with respect to his negligence case, and that the superior court erred by entering a final judgment dismissing his inverse condemnation claim absent a motion for dismissal of that claim.

II. FACTS AND…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ford v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Knight v. American Guard & Alert, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Nielson v. BentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. D.J. v. P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Harvey v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lincoln v. Interior Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sehl v. Vista Linen Rental Services Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Brown v. ElyAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API